Thursday 17 July 2014

Suppressed data

A study that received absolutely no attention from any health news reporters – it’s such an unsexy beast – is, however, a very important one for all of you to note.

In this report published in the journal, PLOS ONE, researchers from Boston University School of Public Health looked at 400 randomly selected clinical trials (what you and I would call “medical studies”) that were completed in the year 2008, and found that 118 of them had not been published.

In other words, about 1/3 of the findings of studies that were started with a view to finding out clinical information never got shared with the public.

Why not?

One can only speculate.

Most of the unpublished studies had been funded by pharmaceutical companies so one can only guess that if the data was unpublished, the most likely reason is that the data didn’t meet the expectations of the funders.

As well, of course, researchers way prefer to publish “positive” reports – they are much more likely to keep getting funded if their fata is helpful – and journals also prefer to publish “positive” stuff.


Bottom line: you should never be surprised when you learn that some drug that’s been out for a few years has been shown to have some unintended consequence.