Thursday, 5 July 2012

Vitamin D in the news-again


A review study in the venerable New England Journal of Medicine (God speaking) concludes that post-menopausal women can reduce their risk of hip fracture by about 30 % with the use of at least 800 IU of vitamin D/day.

As usual, lots of buts, though.

The study did not look at the use of calcium, which is often recommended for the same purpose (i.e. to reduce the risk of fracture) but which in supplement form has been linked to a higher risk of heart attack and stroke.

Nor did the study look at what might happen to people who take too much vitamin D, which is very likely to occur from the millions of people who invariably believe that if a little of something is good for you, a lot of that same thing must be even better (another recent study, for example, found a significantly increased risk of kidney stones in people who take calcium and vitamin D supplements).

Nor did it look at the various forms of vitamin D to see if there‘s any difference in effect on bone health or overall health (vitamin D 3, for example, is said to be much more effective than vitamin D 2, although most supplements come in the form of vitamin D 2).

Nor did this study examine the pretty well-accepted theory that the dose of vitamin D required for maximum bone health likely varies significantly from person to person.

Overall, I think, it’s still best to try to get your vitamin D from natural sources (milk, fish, eggs, and sun), and only when you don’t think you’re getting enough vitamin D from such sources, should you consider supplements.